Today’s students navigate intense academic workloads – lectures, assignments, exam preparation and group projects – while balancing external pressures such as part-time employment and social activities.
Consider class attendance. Enrolling in five semester subjects with three lecture hours each equates to 15 hours per week of classroom time. This is a substantial commitment. How can educators maximise the value of these lecture hours in light of modern technological advancements? My answer: active, mutual interaction.
Three technological advancements have fundamentally changed the educational landscape:
- Artificial intelligence and online content explosion: instant access to high-quality learning materials
- Mobile connectivity surge: unprecedented digital distractions in the classroom
- Democratisation of content creation: easy-to-use, accessible tools for producing educational media
1. The AI and online content explosion
With AI, it has become very easy for students to access high-quality learning materials offering just as much information as their lectures. AI hallucination is an issue but traditional sources are also imperfect.
- To AI or not to AI? That is the question
- The Democracy Lab: how 20 minutes of debate can revive the lecture
- The lecture is dead – long live the performance
Students have countless resources to learn both basic and specialised knowledge. Platforms such as YouTube provide high-quality pedagogical content over which learners enjoy complete viewing control, allowing them to watch, pause and review according to their own schedule. This is a service even the most enthusiastic teacher cannot provide during class time.
The lesson: Information-heavy lectures designed solely to transmit foundational knowledge are no longer efficient.
2. The surge in mobile connectivity
Better mobile connectivity is a significant challenge for education. Most readers will not remember but there was a time when smoking cigarettes was common inside lecture halls and, perhaps unbelievably now, on commercial flights.
My prediction is that future generations might have similar thoughts about mobile communication devices in today’s lecture halls. They are intensely distracting and, to put it over-dramatically, destroy the traditional classroom environment.
The lesson: It is nearly impossible to hold student attention during a passive, information-heavy lecture.
3. The democratisation of content creation
The explosion in online educational content rests on the democratisation of digital content creation. The ease of creation means educators can produce high-quality media reasonably easily. By pairing specialised knowledge with simple digital tools, we can create targeted resources to fill learning gaps with reasonable effort.
The lesson: Think more about producing digital content and less about optimising lectures.
Redefine the classroom as an active space
Does this digital shift make face-to-face learning obsolete? Absolutely not. Instead, it highlights a core truth: what is the point of coming together in class if we do not do anything together?
If lecture hours do not feature active collaboration, they risk becoming a waste of time. Shifting to an interactive environment is a continuous learning process yet each restructured classroom yields experiences that inspire further improvement.
The reality of flipped learning
To foster interaction, I integrated a custom Mooc into my curriculum. The goal is a classic flipped classroom whereby students study digital material at home, arrive prepared and use class time to resolve misunderstandings through discussion.
In practice, motivating every student to watch online content before class is difficult and many complain about the workload. Highly self-motivated students exist but they rarely form the majority.
A new collaborative strategy
My strategy pivots toward collaborative, media-based assignments:
Group formation and topic selection: The first lecture is dedicated to forming teams and selecting video topics. Students refine ideas in class, then post chosen topics to an online discussion forum. This minimises overlap, and the resulting diversity makes screening sessions more engaging.
Concise group video creation: Students produce short videos based on the MOOC content. I require two to five minutes. This keeps the screening schedule manageable and forces students to distil the essence of their message rather than filling time.
Assigned peer commentary: Before screening, I assign each group specific videos to review. For example, groups one and two prepare comments on group three’s video. During screening, the presenting group listens and responds in real time. This ensures that every student comes prepared and transforms passive viewing into active dialogue.
In-class screenings: We watch these videos together during lecture hours. I enforce strict time control per group, essential for managing larger classes. I also encourage critical thinking about non-assigned videos – active participation across the whole class improves their participation mark.
- Structured collaborative review: Class time is used for evaluation and feedback, structured around the assigned peer commentary. I add my own comments as instructor, ensuring expert perspective is woven into the conversation.
These assignments drive deep engagement with the material while building practical digital literacy skills. To ensure success, minimising smartphone and social media access during these sessions is essential to preserving focus.
Achim I. Czerny is professor at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
If you would like advice and insight from academics and university staff delivered direct to your inbox each week, sign up for the Campus newsletter.
comment